86 replies to this topic

[Maggielurva]

Maggielurva - E5200 @ 261MHzx12.5 - 3262.5MHz (2500MHz) 1.192V under load CPU-Z

[NatalieG1987]

NatalieG1987 intel i7-880 @ 200x22 - 4.4GHz (Stock 3.06GHz) 1.**V Under Load CPU-Z

[WOLF_TEAM_LEADER]

NatalieG1987, on 14 December 2010 - 03:34 AM, said:

NatalieG1987 intel i7-880 @ 200x22 - 4.4GHz (Stock 3.06GHz) 1.**V Under Load CPU-Z

Welcome to the forums and that's a nice OC!
I would recommend that you take the advertising out of your signature tho, could get in trouble!

[Futureperfect]

Futureperfect - 980x @ 170.4x29 - 4.941Ghz (Stock 3.33Ghz) 1.544V Under Load CPU-Z

[Aaants]

Aaants - I7 980X @ 201x23 - 4.619Ghz (Stock 3.33Ghz) 1.5V Under Load CPU-Z

Edited by Aaants, 23 January 2011 - 04:47 PM.

[almighty15]

almighty15 - i5 2500k @ 100x50 - 5Ghz (Stock 3.3Ghz) 1.4V Under Load CPU-Z

[Luke]

Luke - FX 8120 @ 214x22.5 - 4.815Ghz (Stock 3.1) - 1.392v under load CPU-z

[Righthooks]

Futureperfect, on 23 January 2011 - 02:38 PM, said:

Futureperfect - 980x @ 170.4x29 - 4.941Ghz (Stock 3.33Ghz) 1.544V Under Load CPU-Z

I have an i7980X as well at 4.5Ghz *1.42v.

May I ask how stable your system is? As that seems extremely high for the Hexacore for normal use...

-Hooks

[Lordred289]

Phenom II X6 1100T 24/7 Ulta Low Voltage OC
3624mhz @ 1.23v
2617nb @ 1.1v
1342Dram 6-6-6-18 1.3v

Dat Proof

Edited by Lordred289, 16 December 2011 - 07:39 PM.

[xXDeltaXx]

xXDeltaXx - Q9450 @ 450x8.0 - 3.6Ghz (2.66GHz stock) 1.250V CPU-Z Under load

[Xavier Zepherious]

Xavier Zepherious i7 3930k@100x42 4.2 ghz (3.2 stock) 1600 GSkill 1.260v CPU-Z under load GA-X79-UD3 (temps 54c)

I'll update when I increase the OC when I get the new Monitor
currently the UEFI on my board does not recognize my SVGA monitor (so getting into UEFI Is a pain- swapping monitors)

[Lordred289]

Increasing settings
CPU @ 1.28v Load
NB @ 1.175v
DRAM @ 1.4v

[doctor killer]

i7-3930K 4.9 GHz (49x100) Vcore (Bios) = 1.390 V, Vcore (CPU-Z) = 1.384V

Loaded temps under 55C

[icebreaker]

i got amd 1100t stock 3.3ghz..overclocked to
4.3 ghz @1.51v
multiplier 22.5,
htlink 2.2ghz,
nb 3 ghz
idle temp 35c and full load 53c
tested with prime 95 torture test

[doctor killer]

update on mine:

i7-3930K @ 5.00 GHz stable

[Hexen525]

I was feeling kinda good about my OC...until I started seeing some of these ;-)

http://valid.canardp....php?id=2301338

Edited by Hexen525, 19 March 2012 - 06:14 AM.

[Honey Badger]

I still think my most impressive OC ever was getting my ol' QX6850 to 4GHz on cheap liquid cooling. That was back in the day though.

I've had the following in the past:

AMD Athlon 3400+ (2.4GHz stock I think) at 2.8GHz (forgot the voltage but it was crazy)
FX-55 @ 3GHz
FX-60 @ 3GHz
Opteron 165 @ 2.6GHz
Opteron 165 (different one) @ 2.4GHz
Opteron 185 @ 3GHz
Then came the switch to Intel...
QX6850 @ 3.666GHz, later 3.8GHz & 4GHz
Q9650 @ 4GHz
QX9770 @ 4GHz
i5 760 @ 4GHz 1.4V (I think, don't remember it's been a while now)
& then my current:
i7 2600k @ 3.8(1.27V)/4.4(1.34V)/4.6GHz(1.36V)

I'll post up a screenie of the CPUz with my current 4.4GHz OC when I get home if I have time... X_X

[britrb]

Britrb - Core i72700K @ 100x46 - 4.600Ghz (Stock 3.50 Ghz) - 1.344 V under load CPU-Z Liquid cooled.

Looking at everyone else's my Bus speed and Multiplier is the other way around. Is this bad? I basically used the Asus easy clock thingy on the board (I'm an OC'ing idiot/noob!)

Brian

[mihapiha]

britrb, on 19 March 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:

Britrb - Core i72700K @ 100x46 - 4.600Ghz (Stock 3.50 Ghz) - 1.344 V under load CPU-Z Liquid cooled.

Looking at everyone else's my Bus speed and Multiplier is the other way around. Is this bad? I basically used the Asus easy clock thingy on the board (I'm an OC'ing idiot/noob!)

Brian

No it's not bad Overclocking works in two ways. Either you raise the baseclock or the multiplier. Last is unlocked usually on the more expensive CPUs, that's why people tend to OC over the baseclock. The baseclock is linked to the memory and MB. So you have 3 reasons instead of one why your OC might be unstable. But if you overclock via baseclock you can also increase the speed of the MB and the memory.

In the end the difference is so small that you wouldn't notice it in 24/7 usage. It easier and in my opinion better to OC the CPU via multiplier. Not only is it easier but you avoid damaging the motherboard or the memory as well ...

You have a solid OC there though

[Luke]

ITX Media pc - i5 2500k 4.3GHz
ATX workstation - fx8120 5.06GHz @ 1.375v