Jump to content


ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC. (Origin Store)

Clevo X7200 RAID and Drive Deciding Help


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 daibido1123

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:40 AM

Hi everyone, I know my question may be odd, but I am getting a X7200. It will be for play and for work, so I have configured it to my needs, except for the Drives. The current parts are 2x GTX 580M, i7 990X, 12GB DDR3 1600Mhz RAM, and Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit. This machine will be used for games, Video recording/editing, Photoshop, and audio restoration/editing. So here is the point of the question, what RAID configuration should I use, and what type of disk would suit best for it? The RAID has to offer redundancy, performance, maximum storage size, and can't be larger than 3 drives.


Thanks for the help.
A heart that can not feel, can not make a soul shine. A soul that can not shine, can not make a mind think. A mind that can not think, can not make a body act. For without faith in one's self, nothing can be done.

Your Ad Here

#2 Challenger

    Network Whiz

  • Administrators
  • 2126 posts
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 24 September 2011 - 09:03 AM

View Postdaibido1123, on 24 September 2011 - 08:40 AM, said:

The RAID has to offer redundancy, performance, maximum storage size, and can't be larger than 3 drives.

Unfortunately on sub $1000 raid controllers its either redundancy OR performance on a three drive setup.

You want performance then you go raid 0 but you'll be living VERY dangerously.

You want redundancy then you go raid 5 but as I said sub $1000 raid cards sacrifice lots of performance when using raid 5.


My advice is you get a SSD for the boot drive so you get the performance for app launches and games and then you use a raid 5 array for all your media files.

#3 daibido1123

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts

Posted 24 September 2011 - 10:46 AM

What about RAID 5 with three SSD's?
A heart that can not feel, can not make a soul shine. A soul that can not shine, can not make a mind think. A mind that can not think, can not make a body act. For without faith in one's self, nothing can be done.

#4 Challenger

    Network Whiz

  • Administrators
  • 2126 posts
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 24 September 2011 - 11:34 AM

View Postdaibido1123, on 24 September 2011 - 10:46 AM, said:

What about RAID 5 with three SSD's?

Ah now that is a different ball game. Few issues with that:

1) No TRIM support when the SSDs are in raid. (having said that my revodrive doesn't seem to have any issues

2) I think you'll still be bottlenecked by your raid controller. Most decent motherboards will come with a raid controller that will be able to do raid 0 fine but raid 5 takes (as i said before) a much better raid controller to get even close to raid 0 speeds with 3 drives.

I still stand by my original comment that you'll be better off getting a single SSD for OS + games and then a single HDD or HDD array for your media. Unless your heavy into rendering in which case you need to look at a ramdisk!

If you want the best performance for your OS + Games then do look at things like the revodrive - but in the testing that Larry, Miha and myself rather unscientifically tested for map loading times there really wasn't a noticeable difference between a vertex2, Revodrive and Revodrive x2 ! For apps it's a totally different story though :)

If you have really important data then i'd go down the NAS or DAS route and have a raid 5 array in one of those then have an SSD for boot in your computer and a Large HDD as a sort of buffer. So when you export your project - video or audio you can store in on the internal HDD then store a copy on the DAS/NAS for safe keeping. That is basically the setup I have.

#5 dirtylarryuk

    PC GAmes Guru

  • Editor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5792 posts
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 24 September 2011 - 11:57 AM

View PostChallenger, on 24 September 2011 - 11:34 AM, said:

Ah now that is a different ball game. Few issues with that:

1) No TRIM support when the SSDs are in raid. (having said that my revodrive doesn't seem to have any issues

2) I think you'll still be bottlenecked by your raid controller. Most decent motherboards will come with a raid controller that will be able to do raid 0 fine but raid 5 takes (as i said before) a much better raid controller to get even close to raid 0 speeds with 3 drives.

I still stand by my original comment that you'll be better off getting a single SSD for OS + games and then a single HDD or HDD array for your media. Unless your heavy into rendering in which case you need to look at a ramdisk!

If you want the best performance for your OS + Games then do look at things like the revodrive - but in the testing that Larry, Miha and myself rather unscientifically tested for map loading times there really wasn't a noticeable difference between a vertex2, Revodrive and Revodrive x2 ! For apps it's a totally different story though :)

If you have really important data then i'd go down the NAS or DAS route and have a raid 5 array in one of those then have an SSD for boot in your computer and a Large HDD as a sort of buffer. So when you export your project - video or audio you can store in on the internal HDD then store a copy on the DAS/NAS for safe keeping. That is basically the setup I have.

Depending on your budget a 60-240GB 500 MB RW SSD (Sandforce is still best) for your OS and apps' (this will also have trim) and then a second SSD for games or just video work 60-240GB (for video the PCIE SSDS rock) this saves wear and tear from the OS drive killing the games-video drive then a nice 2x 1TB raid 1 HDD install for backup as raid one keeps going if one disks fails. And a nice 1-2TB USB 2-3 ext HDD for backup of important data daily-weekly. all this doesn't cost the earth you can pick the 120GB PCIE SSD cheap for hosting 5-20 games and or a decent amount of storage for 1080p editing.

SSD works best with a min' 15-25% free space so 60GB drives are only now if your short on budget. but they are still fine to host win7 and have 50% space left and good ones start from £70.

The key is SSD tech seeks files in the microsecond 50-100x faster than any HDD even in Raid can so they suit your OS but you only need 60GB for win7 to have loads of space, also the 40-80k Iops most of the new drives offers is much faster than the 200 iops even the best HDD offer. For video work the 500-1000MB Read the new G2 SSDs and PCIE SSD offer is a big deal for video editing when tied to 8GB+ RAM.

HDD are 33x cheaper per GB than SSD tech so they are still great for storage, if you want to be pro, then use raid 1 on 2x drives with 1TB -2TB,this is fine for 99% of Soho users and then add a external drive to back the raid up on

[Posted Image
3D RIG: 3XS Silverstone,TJ 109, EVGA 790i full H20, Win7 64, QX9650 3.3 Ghz, POV GTX 470,
Corsair Force 160Gb SSD, OCZ Vertex 2E 60Gb SSD (W7 boot), Razer Megladon 7.1, Lycosa Mirror SE+ G9X.
DISPLAYS:: 1080p 2D Optoma DLP 120" 0.02 ms 21:9 "- Acer Nvidia 3D 23.6" 2ms 16:9 1080p, iiyama 1200p 26" 16:9 5ms.
2D RIG:3XS bundle, I7 2600k 4.9 Ghz, P8 P67 PRO, SS FT02SE, MSi 6970, 4GB DDR3 1600 Mhz, 60GB Vertex 2E SSD (W7 64 Boot) OCZ Revo x2 240 Gb ,Mamba,
Webbook: Nvidia Tegra 2 Motorola Xoom. OS:Andriod Honeycomb Media Acer Revo-Nvidia Ion,
OS: Vista 32
Notebook: ASUS N53S, 32nm i5 Mobile 2.8Ghz,Nvidia GT540M 2Gb, 4GB DDR3, 640GB HDD 15.6" LED, Blu-ray, B&O ICE speakers,
G930 7.1 HS






Your Ad Here